Discussion:
Has Viacom been "Spumcoed" again?
(too old to reply)
Mister X
2003-09-10 14:06:57 UTC
Permalink
The shenanigans of late episodes, poor product, outraged fans and
Spumco's delusions of grandeur, not to mention plummeting ratings seems
to have killed Viacom's interest in the "new" Ren & Stimpy Show.

Will Viacom put together a more competent reliable production house to
continue producing episodes out of John K's hands as Nick did by forming
Games productions? Has history repeated itself?

X
R. Westermeyer
2003-09-10 22:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mister X
The shenanigans of late episodes, poor product, outraged fans and
Spumco's delusions of grandeur, not to mention plummeting ratings seems
to have killed Viacom's interest in the "new" Ren & Stimpy Show.
Will Viacom put together a more competent reliable production house to
continue producing episodes out of John K's hands as Nick did by forming
Games productions? Has history repeated itself?
X
I don't know the inside stuff, but where does Bob Camp stand with all
this. I thought the episodes he directed after the Nick thing were
fine. The product seemed to be delivered realizable too. Is he still
in the circuit?

--Bob
******
The More you loathe humanity
the riper you are for God,
for a dialogue with no one.
--E.M. Cioran
Ted Stephens
2003-09-11 17:40:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mister X
The shenanigans of late episodes, poor product, outraged fans and
Spumco's delusions of grandeur, not to mention plummeting ratings seems
to have killed Viacom's interest in the "new" Ren & Stimpy Show.
Will Viacom put together a more competent reliable production house to
continue producing episodes out of John K's hands as Nick did by forming
Games productions? Has history repeated itself?
TV GUIDE just printed their complaint against Spike TV and their stupid
animated bugs that ruin all of the shows. If it is even pissing off the
publishers at TV GUIDE to print that, you can imagine how pissed off EVERYONE
else is.

Yet they can't seem to figure out why their ratings are so poor even after
the THOUSANDS of complaint letters they have been getting about this and then
instead of getting rid of the animated bugs, they actually make them MORE
animated, LARGER and use them now CONSTANTLY during a program.

What assholes.

I am glad they will be gone before the end of the year is up.

Let that be a LESSON to them.
Stephen Worth
2003-09-11 21:20:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted Stephens
Yet they can't seem to figure out why their ratings are so poor
The ratings aren't poor.

See ya
Steve
--
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
VIP RECORDS: Rare 78 rpm recordings on CD in great sound
20s Dance Bands - Swing - Opera - Classical - Vaudeville - Ragtime
FREE MP3s OF COMPLETE SONGS http://www.vintageip.com/records/
NEO-GEO
2003-09-11 19:10:12 UTC
Permalink
Yep, I heard that also. Plus they took the "magic" out of R&S and made
it as generic as a Scooby Doo and Scrappy (eech) cartoon.

hehe
Post by R. Westermeyer
I don't know the inside stuff, but where does Bob Camp stand with all
this. I thought the episodes he directed after the Nick thing were
fine. The product seemed to be delivered realizable too.
You don't know the inside stuff. The first couple of Games seasons were
twice as late and cost at over double the budget of the Spumco
episodes.
See ya
Steve
Newt
2003-09-11 04:52:46 UTC
Permalink
"not to mention plummeting ratings"

Where's your evidence? And please don't cite shenanigans as evidence.
Post by Mister X
The shenanigans of late episodes, poor product, outraged fans and
Spumco's delusions of grandeur, not to mention plummeting ratings seems
to have killed Viacom's interest in the "new" Ren & Stimpy Show.
Will Viacom put together a more competent reliable production house to
continue producing episodes out of John K's hands as Nick did by forming
Games productions? Has history repeated itself?
X
Loading...